Grading Condition
Mint Condition! Now there’s an overused term.
It’s hard to imagine that in 75 years or more a bottle
did not acquire some evidence of its use or abuse. The fact is
that many bottles commonly referred to as “mint” have
evidence of wear in the form of one or more tiny, light scratches
that can be seen with the naked eye (particularly on the base.)
And if you really want to explode the “mint condition” myth,
take a close look at a “mint” example with a magnifying
glass (guaranteed to ruin your day!) The fact is that “mint,” by
many standards, has come to be used to describe any bottle free
of chips, cracks, bruises and obvious scratches.
For our own grading purposes, we don’t use mint unless
we can find no blemishes whatsoever with the naked eye, and let
me assure you, such bottles are few and far between. In our terminology,
bottles of exceptional quality are referred to as “near
mint” and then any blemishes visible with the naked eye
are noted. When listing several tiny blemishes for total accuracy
some bottles begin to sound like they have “problems,” when
in fact they would still be considered by many to be “mint.” That
is why customers often remark in our feedback “better than
described.” When grading dozens of bottles a week there
are bound to be an occasional blemish overlooked and this is
why we offer a liberal return policy, which includes refund of
return shipping cost if an item is found to not meet the description
(see our full return policy here.)
We also make sure to note any manufacturing defects that may
detract from, or sometimes add too, the display quality of the
bottle. Anneal lines, open surface bubbles, potstones and any
other irregularities (see Condition Terms) are mentioned when
they affect the display quality, either positively or negatively,
of a piece.
Previous Page | Next
Page
|
|